🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions regarding the remarks made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz during the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was appropriate. Rather, he invoked the continued drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose the American defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, who Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the chance to beat the three best players in the world back-to-back. Fritz is more than justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the drought of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive power on each front side and backhand are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, though, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller men. He is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a several significant, improbable improvements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly surged up to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing drought of American men winning major titles when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task too little.

The American star achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s play in that exact quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a couple match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American creating plenty of chances to break. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a terrible game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to expend far too much energy to win it. Down match points in the final game, his primary delivery floated to heaven. He prolonged the contest twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of the Serbian, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, more so than virtually anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, willing to not just say how he feels or the strategy he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed a journalist in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {